Advertisement
Caroll has played since. Jon Buckle/PA Wire/Press Association Images
Crocked

West Ham owner regrets buying injury-prone Carroll

David Sullivan says the Hammers wouldn’t have signed the striker if they had known he would be sidelined for so long.

WEST HAM CO-owner David Sullivan has admitted to a sense of regret over the club-record signing of Andy Carroll.

After impressing on loan with Sam Allardyce’s men, Carroll completed a permanent switch from Liverpool in the summer for an undisclosed fee reported to be £15million.

However, a heel injury has prevented the England forward from featuring since his big-money move, and West Ham have endured a troubled Premier League campaign to date in Carroll’s absence.

The London club sit 17th, out of the relegation zone on goal difference alone, and have mustered just 13 goals from 15 matches.

Discussing Carroll’s continued time on the sidelines, a frustrated Sullivan told the BBC: “Had we known he would be out for this long, we would not have signed him.

“We are not a rich enough club to deal with that. You know any player can get injured, but we can’t buy a player knowing he is going to be out for half the season.

“When we signed him we were assured by the medical staff that the very, very latest he would be back was September 1. That would have meant he would only miss two league games.

He is a fantastic player, don’t get me wrong, but I only wouldn’t have signed him because I can’t have that amount of wages and that amount of transfer fee (being spent) on a player who isn’t going to play a minimum 20 or 30 games a season, hopefully 38 games a season.”

Sullivan has no doubts over Carroll’s ability and remains hopeful the forward can inspire a West Ham resurgence in the new year.

He added: “If you ask me the same question at the end of the season, I hope I will be able to give you a different answer and say, ‘yes, it was the right decision to sign Andy Carroll.’”

“On his day he is unplayable. We love him and that is why we signed him. “He is desperate to come back; he is sweating blood in training.

“He has been all over Europe for treatment, (but) even now we haven’t got a date that he could be back. He could be back in three weeks; he could be back in six or eight weeks.”

Saints sign Quigley and keep hold of Forrester

Brendan Rodgers plans January transfer business

Your Voice
Readers Comments
3
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.