Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Themba Hadebe via Press Association Images
Court

Pistorius could get 15 years in one of South Africa's brutal prisons or dodge jail altogether

He’s back in court for pre-sentencing arguments after he was convicted of culpable homicide in the killing of his girlfriend.

FALLEN PARALYMPIC HERO Oscar Pistorius returns to court today at the start of his sentencing hearing after he was convicted of culpable homicide in the killing of his girlfriend, with his lawyers set to argue for leniency.

The double-amputee track star last month escaped a murder conviction in a verdict that shocked the country and fuelled criticism of South Africa’s legal system.

Kicking off what is expected to be a lengthy sentencing process, the defence team will bring mitigation arguments before Judge Thokozile Masipa in the High Court in Pretoria. Prosecutors will follow by arguing for aggravating circumstances.

The process is expected to last up to four days, with Masipa then likely adjourning court and announcing her sentencing decision at a later date.

The “Blade Runner” could face as much as 15 years in one of South Africa’s notoriously brutal prisons or could dodge a jail term altogether with a non-custodial sentence after being found guilty on the equivalent of a manslaughter charge, but not guilty of premeditated murder.

The court will begin by hearing defence witnesses testify on why Pistorius should not serve time behind bars.

They are likely to argue that the country’s prisons are not suited for his disability and that the 2012 London Paralympics silver medallist is a first time offender.

South Africa Pistorius Running Future AP / Press Association Images AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

Lawyer David Dadic said the defence will “heavily expand on their trial argument regarding Oscar’s remorsefulness” in killing his girlfriend of Reeva Steenkamp.

The biggest factor, however, which the defence will raise is, of course, the fact that Oscar is a first time offender.

In turn, the state will call witnesses to testify on why he should serve the stiffest penalty, raising the issue of his history of negligence with firearms.

After the sentence is handed down, both the state and defence can appeal, a legal process likely to drag out for years.

In September, Judge Masipa ruled the 27-year-old did not knowingly shoot to kill 29-year-old model and law graduate Steenkamp on Valentine’s Day 2013.

The sprinter admitted he fired four hollow point bullets through a locked toilet door in his upmarket Pretoria home, but said he believed he had been shooting at a burglar.

Masipa’s ruling outraged many South Africans, including lawyers who believed she misinterpreted the definition of murder and questioned whether the justice system is failing the crime-plagued country.

Pistorius is currently out on bail of one million rand ($90,000). He had to sell his posh house inside a gated compound in Pretoria, the scene of the crime, to fund the cost of the trial, and has withdrawn from competitive sport since his arrest.

The trial which began on March 3 was broadcast live on television and radio, feeding insatiable local and international media interest.

South Africa Pistorius Trial AP / Press Association Images AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

The athlete cut a lonely figure in the dock, at some points sobbing and retching loudly while testifying.

- © AFP, 2014

Read: Mum of Reeva Steenkamp to publish “insider” book on Pistorius trial>

Read: Oscar Pistorius verdict is not justice, says Reeva Steenkamp’s family>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
16
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.