Advertisement
Croatia defender Domagoj Vida.
Investigation

Croatia star Vida could be in hot water over allegations of anti-Russian comments

The defender appeared in a social media video after last night’s World Cup quarter-final win over Russia.

FIFA IS INVESTIGATING Domagoj Vida’s conduct after the Croatia international allegedly made anti-Russian comments following his side’s quarter-final win against the World Cup hosts.

Vida was on the scoresheet with an extra-time header as Croatia triumphed on penalties following a thrilling 2-2 draw in Sochi last night, booking a semi-final clash against England.

But the Besiktas defender could be sanctioned prior to that game, with Fifa looking into comments he seemingly made in a social media video.

Appearing alongside former Croatia international Ognjen Vukojevic — with whom he played at Dynamo Kiev — Vida said: “Glory to Ukraine.”

The phrase has been used by Ukrainian anti-Russian nationalists, with Vukojevic adding: “This victory is for Dynamo and Ukraine.”

Vida’s fate is now in Fifa’s hands, with the body examining the incident.

“FIFA is processing the different reports of the said match as well as potential evidence concerning the matter,” Fifa said in a statement released to Omnisport. “Until we have evaluated all information available, we cannot comment further.”

Fifa’s disciplinary code prohibits “political slogans in any form” with “anyone who provokes the general public during a match” facing a two-match ban.

Switzerland players including Xherdan Shaqiri were fined but not banned for making hand gestures resembling an eagle, a symbol of Albania, against Serbia earlier in the World Cup.

Russia’s most-capped player of all time retires following World Cup exit

Klopp praises Karius’ display in first outing since Champions League final

Your Voice
Readers Comments
13
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel