It makes the case that Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs to in every major event he has ever competed in.
More damningly, it paints Armstrong as the driving force behind a sophisticated, worldwide doping ring involving riders, coaches, and trainers.
Advertisement
At this point, there is only one argument left for Armstrong to make: everyone was doing it. Specifically, 20 of 21 top-3 finishers from 1999 to 2005 were doing it, and 36 of 45 top-3 finishers from 1996 to 2010 were doing it. Take a look at this paragraph (which was slipped into the introduction of the report without much comment) in the USADA report:
Twenty of the twenty-one podium finishers in the Tour de France from 1999 through 2005 have been directly tied to likely doping through admissions, sanctions, public investigations or exceeding the UCI hematocrit threshold. Of the forty-five podium finishes during the time period between 1996 and 2010, thirty-six were by riders similarly tainted by doping.
So in a 15-year period, there were only nine riders who managed to succeed without cheating, according to the USADA.
It’s fair to say that in that period, doping was a competitive element of the sport. You could argue that no one got an unfair advantage by doping because everyone was competing on the same (albeit outlawed) chemical playing field.
This statistic about how many Tour de France riders were doping is the only defence Lance Armstrong has left
THE 202-PAGE report on the Lance Armstrong doping scandal that the US Anti-Doping Agency dropped yesterday is damning.
It makes the case that Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs to in every major event he has ever competed in.
More damningly, it paints Armstrong as the driving force behind a sophisticated, worldwide doping ring involving riders, coaches, and trainers.
At this point, there is only one argument left for Armstrong to make: everyone was doing it. Specifically, 20 of 21 top-3 finishers from 1999 to 2005 were doing it, and 36 of 45 top-3 finishers from 1996 to 2010 were doing it. Take a look at this paragraph (which was slipped into the introduction of the report without much comment) in the USADA report:
So in a 15-year period, there were only nine riders who managed to succeed without cheating, according to the USADA.
It’s fair to say that in that period, doping was a competitive element of the sport. You could argue that no one got an unfair advantage by doping because everyone was competing on the same (albeit outlawed) chemical playing field.
What do you think?
Gavazzi beats Ireland’s Dan Martin in Beijing sprint finish
Tony Griffin urges Lance Armstrong to ‘step up and tell the world what has really gone on’
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Cycling Doping Drugs Fall-out Lance Armstrong Lance Armstrong report Livestrong Pat McQuaid PEDS TDF Tour de France UCI US Anti-doping Agency USADA World Anti-Doping Code