Why are we asking you to sign in? Find out more here
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy .
Why are we asking you to sign in? Find out more here
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy .
Chelsea approach to Clattenburg allegations questioned
SOCIETY OF BLACK Lawyers chairman Peter Herbert criticised Chelsea for not forwarding their allegations against Mark Clattenburg to police.
The west London club lodged an official complaint to the Football Association following their 3-2 defeat to Manchester United in October, claiming referee Clattenburg used ‘inappropriate language’ towards midfielder John Obi Mikel.
However, neither the club nor player forwarded their allegations onto the police, who have subsequently dropped their investigation into the Premier League official, citing a lack of evidence as a primary reason.
And Herbert has condemned the club’s approach and believes it is further proof of football’s inability to effectively deal with racism.
He told Sky Sports: “What seems to have happened is that although Chelsea made a report to the FA they’ve decided, in their infinite wisdom, not to submit the same papers to police.
“It highlights the fact that football cannot regulate itself and really, on this issue of race, always wants to take the path of least resistance. Given the publicity this engendered it’s fair for all concerned, including the person who’s alleged to have made the comment, that justice is seen to be done and it’s not dealt with by the FA internally.”
FIFA announces 10 Puskas Award nominations for Goal of the Year
Ireland v Greece: O’Shea urges young stars to shine
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Chelsea English Football Mark Clattenburg News Premier League Probe UK Football