This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 18 °C Friday 10 April, 2020

Liverpool defender Sakho accepts positive drugs test findings

Sakho was found to have tested positive for a prohibited drug and will remain unavailable for selection.

MAMADOU SAKHO HAS accepted Uefa’s finding of a banned substance in the ‘A’ sample he submitted after Liverpool’s 1-1 Europa League draw with Manchester United on 17 March.

A fat-burner is understood to have triggered the positive result, and the 26-year-old informed the governing body of his decision on Tuesday, when he also provided explanations for the presence of the prohibited product.

Liverpool will not comment on the matter as it is a process between the player and Uefa, and will only offer a position once the undertaking is resolved.

Sakho’s case will be dealt with by Uefa’s Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body and his mitigation will be taken into consideration during the investigation.

Due to the strict liability stance which underpins the doping policy, the France international will have to satisfactorily explain how a prohibited substance was found in his sample. The burden of proof is solely his.

A hearing will be set and Sakho faces an anxious wait to discover the punishment he will face. In the meantime, per a joint-decision between the defender and the club, he will remain unavailable for selection during the process.

Team-mate Kolo Toure escaped the minimum two-year sentence for a first-time offence while at Manchester City in 2011 when he took diet pills that contravened the rules. The Ivorian was dealt a six-month ban instead, with an independent regulatory commission stating: “The player accepted he was at fault and with that concession we agree.

“He was at fault in the limited and perfunctory efforts he made in relation to the water tablets; the checks he made in relation to those tablets were inadequate and fell some way below what it would be reasonable to expect of a professional footballer in these circumstances.”

The42 is on Snapchat! Tap the button below on your phone to add!

Guardiola: ‘My Bayern reputation hinges on Champions League success’

O’Neill: I spoke to other managers at PFA Awards about contingency plans for Euro 2016

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

About the author:

The42 Team

Read next: