Advertisement
Froome: "I have no issues with the leak which confirms my statements." Christophe Ena
anti-doping

Chris Froome says he has nothing to hide as hackers release more medical files

Froome and Bradley Wiggins among five British athletes named in latest WADA file leak.

CHRIS FROOME DEFENDED his right to a therapeutic use exemption after becoming one of the latest athletes to have his medical records leaked by computer hackers.

Froome was one of five British athletes together with fellow cyclist Bradley Wiggins, golfer Charley Hull, rower Sam Townsend and rugby sevens player Heather Fisher to have confidential medical records made public without their consent.

There is no suggestion any of the five have broken doping rules.

On Tuesday, the World Anti Doping Association announced that the Russian cyber-espionage group known as Fancy Bears had broken into its anti-doping database. The hacking group released information gleaned from the files of sports stars including US Olympic gymnast Simone Biles and tennis champions Venus and Serena Williams.

They said the leaks were “retaliation” for the agency’s role in uncovering “state-sponsored doping” in Russia which led athletics body the IAAF to ban the country’s track and field team from this year’s Olympic games in Rio.

The five British athletes were among a second batch of 25 sportsmen and women from eight countries to have their details leaked.

TUEs exist to allow athletes with recognised medical conditions such as asthma, from which Rio gold medallist Wiggins suffers, to take drugs on WADA’s banned list for their ailment so they can compete in elite level sport.

In a statement issued Thursday, the 31-year-old Froome said: “I’ve openly discussed my TUEs with the media and have no issues with the leak which confirms my statements.

“In nine years as a professional I’ve twice required a TUE for exacerbated asthma, the last time was in 2014.”

‘Grossly unfair’

Long before these leaks, concerns had been raised across several sports as to whether the TUE process was being abused by athletes looking to gain a competitive edge over their rivals.

While that debate continues, UK Anti-Doping’s Nicole Sapstead issued a statement insisting all TUEs in Britain were issued on the basis of “medical need” only.

“UKAD strongly condemns actions of this nature and we are appalled that five members of Team GB have had their private data published illegally online,” she said.

“Not only does it undermine our work and the protection of clean sport, but it is grossly unfair to the athletes, whose personal data has been put at risk.

Sapstead added: “It is important to note that in the UK, applications for Therapeutic Use Exemptions, TUEs, are subject to a strict and independent process. Applications submitted to UKAD are assessed by at least three independent medics and are then referred to WADA, which has further independent oversight of applications.

“This robust process is in place to ensure that TUEs are granted based solely on medical need — they are not an indication of doping.

“They are there to support the clean athlete’s right to compete, despite a medical condition.”

On Wednesday, Russia’s sports minister denied there had been any Russian government involvement in the hacks.

“How can you prove that they are hackers from Russia? You blame Russia for everything,” Vitaly Mutko said through a translator on the sidelines of a congress of UEFA, European football’s governing body.

(C) AFP 2016

WADA condemns Russian hackers for leaking records of Williams sisters and Simone Biles

The42 is on Snapchat! Tap the button below on your phone to add!

Your Voice
Readers Comments
22
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.