This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 17 February, 2019

The 76 million reasons NBA superstars are less likely to leave their teams in future

The NBA’s new collective bargaining agreement encourages players to stay with their current team.

Players like Steph Curry are much less likely to leave their teams in future.
Players like Steph Curry are much less likely to leave their teams in future.
Image: Ben Margot/AP/Press Association Images

THE NBA HAS a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and the biggest change is how superstars can be paid in free agency. With the change, the NBA has seemingly put an end — for now — to superstars jumping ship like the way Kevin Durant abandoned the Oklahoma City Thunder to sign with the Golden State Warriors this past summer.

Similar to the old CBA, superstar players who meet certain criteria (e.g. being named MVP) are eligible for larger contracts. But unlike the old CBA, there is now a much larger incentive for these superstars to re-sign with their current teams.

Under the new CBA, these so-called “designated players” are eligible to sign new contracts with a first-year salary equal to 35% of the salary cap, but only if they re-sign with their current team. That drops to 30% if they sign with a new team.

In other words, based on next season’s projected salary cap of $102 million, a superstar free agent like Steph Curry would be choosing between a first-year salary of $35.7 million by re-signing with the Warriors or a $30.6 million first-year salary with another team.

This is huge, because in the past, the difference between re-signing and leaving was negligible in the long run. Re-signing players could sign a longer contract (five years for re-signing players and four years for players on new teams), but players could make up that difference in their next contract.

In addition, players staying with a team got slightly larger annual raises (7.5% annually for re-signing and 4.5% on a new team). However, that difference might be only a few million dollars over four seasons, something that could easily be overcome by a team playing in a more tax-friendly state.

While the lengths of the contracts and the annual raises have remained the same, the new starting salary levels makes those other differences much more effective. Not only would Curry make $5 million more in the first season, he would make nearly $30 million more in the first four seasons by re-signing with the Warriors and $76 million more over the life of the contracts.

In other words, players like Curry aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.

Source: Cork Gaines/Business Insider

- Cork Gaines, Business Insider

Bradley Wiggins signs up for TV show following retirement from cycling

Frampton setting his sights on becoming first Irish three-weight world champion

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

Published with permission from:

Business Insider
Business Insider is a business site with strong financial, media and tech focus.

Read next:


This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

    Leave a commentcancel